Keir Starmer expressed astonishment in front of MPs for not being informed about Peter Mandelson’s failure to pass security vetting. During a lengthy statement at the Commons, the Prime Minister conveyed his frustration and anger towards Foreign Office officials for the lack of communication regarding the situation.
Starmer emphasized that had he known about the UK Security Vetting’s disapproval of Lord Mandelson, he would not have proceeded with the appointment. Consequently, he announced the removal of the Foreign Office’s authority to override vetting decisions and initiated a comprehensive review of the security vetting process.
The Mirror highlighted key points from Starmer’s statement, where he criticized the deliberate decisions made to withhold information about Mandelson’s vetting status from senior politicians. He emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in government operations and expressed disbelief at the lack of disclosure by Foreign Office officials.
Starmer also shared his surprise at not being informed about UKSV’s recommendation against granting clearance to Lord Mandelson. Following this revelation, the Prime Minister took steps to ensure that all decisions related to national security vetting are thoroughly examined.
The statement witnessed criticism from left-wing MPs, including Diane Abbott and John McDonnell, questioning the appointment of Mandelson and the lack of transparency in the process. The debate also raised concerns about other potential political appointments to the Foreign Office similar to the Mandelson case.
Amidst the heated discussions, Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey called for Starmer’s resignation, accusing him of failing to take responsibility for the situation. Starmer defended his actions, stating that he followed the established process and accepted the need for changes in the vetting procedure post the Mandelson incident.